---
The Case for Holding Steady
The Federal Reserve faces one of its most delicate balancing acts in years. With inflation risks front and center and geopolitical conflict disrupting global energy markets, the central bank is almost certainly going to hold rates steady at its current meeting. The signals were already pointing in that direction before the war broke out, and escalating price pressures have only reinforced the case for patience.
But the real story isn't the hold itself — it's what comes next. The Summary of Economic Projections is expected to tell a sobering tale: a downward revision in growth forecasts to around 2.1% for 2026, an uptick in the unemployment forecast to 4.6%, and — most critically — an upward revision in PCE inflation to 3% and core PCE to 2.9%. These numbers paint a picture of an economy cooling on one side while heating up on the other.
If there is a rate cut this year at all, it is most likely to come in December rather than September. The shocks currently rippling through the economy operate on a time lag, meaning their full impact won't materialize for months. The Fed will want to see hard data confirming the trajectory before making any moves, and that data simply won't arrive soon enough for an earlier cut.
The Oil Price Wildcard
Energy markets are the elephant in the room. Gasoline prices have already climbed roughly 82 cents since the onset of the conflict, and the situation could get considerably worse. The critical threshold to watch is $125 per barrel for crude oil — a level that would translate to approximately $4.25 per gallon for unleaded gasoline on a national average and push headline inflation toward 4%. At that point, the total cost to each American household through the energy channel alone would reach roughly $425.
The $5 per gallon gasoline scenario that consumers dread would require an even steeper climb in oil prices, but it cannot be ruled out. The conflict has effectively taken approximately 12 million barrels per day off the export market from the Middle East. This isn't just about fuel — the same hydrocarbons are feedstocks for nitrogen fertilizers, petrochemicals, healthcare inputs, and technology components. A prolonged disruption would send inflationary shockwaves through sectors far removed from the gas pump.
Markets Are Underestimating Geopolitical Duration
Financial markets appear to be pricing in a relatively short conflict — roughly four to five weeks. As of this writing, the war is on day 19. But geopolitical risk has always been the Achilles heel of forward-looking financial markets. There is a meaningful chance that the timeline stretches well beyond what is currently anticipated, and the market may be underappreciating this risk.
The key variable is whether and when Middle Eastern oil, condensates, natural gas, and other liquids resume their normal export flows. Until that happens, energy prices will remain elevated and volatile, feeding directly into the inflation data the Fed watches most closely.
The Fed's Dual Mandate Under Tension
When inflation and employment pressures move in opposite directions, the Fed's playbook is clear: prioritize price stability. This is not arbitrary — price stability is viewed as a precondition for maximum sustainable employment. You cannot have a healthy labor market in an environment where prices are spiraling unpredictably.
This means the Fed is likely to lean hawkish in both its official statements and press conferences. Markets should be prepared for that tone, and it shouldn't trigger a dramatic equity selloff. A hawkish lean in the aftermath of what may be the largest oil shock since the 1970s is entirely rational.
Inflation Expectations: The Lesson of the Pandemic
One of the most important shifts in Fed thinking coming out of the pandemic era is a renewed attention to short-term inflation expectations. During the pandemic, the Fed made the mistake of dismissing short-term moves in both professional and public inflation expectations. The preferred professional metrics simply missed the building wave of inflation, and by the time the Fed responded, it was behind the curve.
That mistake won't be repeated. The Fed is now watching inflation expectations with far greater vigilance. If headline inflation — expected to jump to between 3.5% and 4% in the March and April data — begins bleeding into core measures, the conversation could shift from "when do we cut?" to "do we need to hike?" That's the tail risk scenario that should keep investors attentive.
Pre-Existing Pressures Were Already Building
It's important to recognize that the current inflationary pressures didn't emerge in a vacuum. Even before the geopolitical shock, the PCE data was showing a worrying move higher in goods prices and stubbornly sticky service prices. These weren't merely seasonal turn-of-the-year adjustments. They reflected deeper structural pressures: ongoing tariff policy impacts and robust consumer demand, particularly among upper-income households whose financial conditions remain strong.
The U.S. economy is a $30 trillion dynamic and resilient beast. It can absorb a large shock without tipping into recession. But absorbing a shock and emerging unscathed are two very different things. Slower growth and higher inflation — the uncomfortable middle ground of stagflationary pressure — is the most likely outcome for the months ahead. The Fed will preach patience, and patience is exactly what's required. But the price of that patience will be felt at the pump, at the grocery store, and in the delayed relief that borrowers have been hoping for all year.