Back to News

Quantum Computing Crosses From Lab Promise to Commercial Reality

TechnologyBusinessEconomy

The Signal That Makes This Time Different

For years, the only voices insisting that quantum computing was near and about to arrive belonged to the quantum companies themselves. That made healthy skepticism difficult to sustain, because the people making the claims were also the ones selling the systems. What has genuinely changed is the source of the enthusiasm. It is no longer just the sellers of quantum systems talking up the technology — it is now the buyers. That shift in who is doing the talking is a far harder signal to dismiss.

Consider who those buyers are. Foxconn, the world's largest electronics manufacturer, is looking at quantum. Financial institutions are looking at it. Defense companies are looking at it, all of them aiming to adopt quantum technologies in the near to intermediate term. Put another way: the company that manufactures your iPhone, the bank that holds your mortgage, and the Pentagon are all pulling in the same direction and converging on quantum. When such different and serious institutions align on the same technology, it is a telltale sign that quantum is real and will be implemented and adopted within the next few years.

From Promise to Commercialization

Has the conversation moved from one about promise to one about commercialization? Yes, decisively. For a long time quantum was regarded more as a science project — things happening in labs and on paper, but not translating into real revenue. That has changed. Real revenue is now visible on two fronts: the pure-play quantum companies are generating revenue, and industries are actively adopting the technology. Healthcare, materials, and finance are among the sectors putting quantum to use. The technology has moved into the real world and is demonstrating that it can be commercialized.

That trajectory is expected to continue, with revenue increasing over time. But the value story is not only about revenue. There is significant broader value in the form of efficiency gains, technological advancement, accumulated knowledge, and overall shareholder value for stock owners. This move into the real world is a substantial boon for the quantum computing theme as a whole.

Why Bookings and RPO Matter More Than the Bottom Line

Why should investors watch bookings and remaining performance obligation (RPO) rather than the top and bottom lines? Because for these companies, profitability and the bottom line are simply not where anyone in the investing world is looking right now. What matters is revenue growth, or at least signs of forward-looking momentum — and RPO and bookings capture exactly that. They are good forward-looking indicators, and since the market is inherently forward-looking, these are the metrics that align with how the market values the space.

By contrast, trailing revenue, EBITDA, and other profitability metrics are not really relevant at this stage. The appropriate lens for these companies is forward momentum, not backward-looking earnings measures.

How to Get Exposure: Bet on the Theme, Not the Winner

If an investor wants exposure to quantum, how should they think about the different approaches, and is it too early to pick winners? The favored approach is to invest in the technology and the theme itself rather than trying to identify the single winner. The right mental model is to treat quantum computing the way one would have treated AI or the cloud ten or twelve years ago — you invest in the theme, not in guessing which specific name comes out on top.

The pure-play quantum companies each pursue different technical approaches, which makes picking an eventual winner uncertain. A better strategy is to invest across the broad quantum ecosystem: the pure plays, but also the enablers, adjacent industries, and everything surrounding them. One vehicle built on exactly this philosophy is the QTM ETF, which has been around for eight years and has always been all in on the quantum ecosystem — deliberately not concentrating on individual names or trying to pick the winner, but seeking exposure to the broad technology as the investment itself. Long-standing bullishness on quantum as a technology existed even before pure-play names were available, and that conviction in the theme remains.

The Bottom Line

The through-line across these views is consistent: quantum computing has crossed the threshold from laboratory promise to commercial technology, validated by serious institutional buyers across manufacturing, finance, and defense. The appropriate way to gauge the companies is through forward-looking momentum metrics like bookings and RPO, and the appropriate way to invest is by owning the broad ecosystem rather than betting on any single winner.

Comments