Back to News

Tech's Bias to the Upside Amid Rampant Single-Stock AI Volatility

BusinessEconomyTechnology

Chips are back in rally mode, with the SOX bouncing off its 50-day simple moving average. The broad indexes hide what is actually happening. Look at the S&P equal weight, the Dow Jones, or the Russell and you miss the story, because the real action sits inside the tech-AI complex. That is where the higher volatility lives, where the concentration is, and where the concentration of EPS growth in the economy is. Heavy AI spending sends ripple effects through the economy, lifting the stock market, feeding the wealth effect, and supporting the upper-K consumer. It all ties together.

The chip swings

The SOX has pulled back roughly 30% from its highs in about two weeks. The trigger was Micron's report around June 25th; Micron is down 30%, and it did the exact same thing back in February after it reported. Anyone playing in this space is not too phased by the volatility, though on a margin basis positioning is stretched.

Right now the trade sits near the 50-day simple moving average. A good bounce means a convincing green close that rewards the dip buyers. Recall March, April, and May: the Iran war was on, oil prices were climbing, and the money rotated into AI infrastructure and chips as the safety trade. If Iran flared up again with higher oil and that market psychology were still healthy and intact, you would expect a bigger bounce out of the chips. Near-term the group is probably oversold, and some bias to the upside over the next couple of days would not be a surprise.

Concentration, speculation, and leadership

The market looks like it is searching, or at least fighting, for leadership. The back-and-forth, high-volatility action does not necessarily mark a top, and this is not a top call. But the concentration is extreme. The velocity of margin growth was running up 50% year-over-year as of a couple of weeks ago, and how much of that excess got wrung out is still an open question. When you get moves like the Kospi down 10% a couple of weeks later, then 7% down overnight, plus what happened with Samsung, that is heavy speculative excess and concentrated positioning. The late-1990s internet stocks produced the same kind of big moves.

The response is to stay nimble, carry some kind of hedge, and be honest about your own trading style and risk tolerance before playing in this environment. Holding both sides of the fence, including VIX hedges out in the futures, gives you things that can work when the tape flip-flops day to day. Leadership ultimately comes back to the economy and EPS growth. Lately financials, insurance, and REITs have moved higher, offering places where money flow will go without the same volatility you get in the AI infrastructure cohort.

Rotation into other sectors

Some investors are avoiding tech altogether and piling into consumer-facing names: the GLP-1s, which explains the healthcare move, the top end of the K, the airlines that benefited from oil coming off, and even specialty plays like Chef's Warehouse that cater to Wagyu beef and specialty chocolate buyers.

How constructive do those areas look for reaching year-end targets? It comes down to the Sharpe ratio and the risk-adjusted return: how much risk you take on by going into AI and tech versus elsewhere. On earnings stability, many of those other sectors can work, and they have benefited from AI capital spending, but you also need the interest rate environment to behave. There is potential rate volatility ahead, already showing up, and it can create economic ripples. So diversify. That can mean gold and silver, which have been beaten down and out of favor, or running value screens and higher dividend yields, the defensive playbook you reach for by watching where money goes when the market is down big. Do not go all in on the AI trade, and do not go all in on the rate-sensitive financial sector. Carry more diversification, hold even some cash on the sidelines, and if you have done really well, there is nothing wrong with taking some money off the table.

The capex question

The open question about rotating into other sectors: if the hyperscalers cut CapEx later this month, it creates ripples in chips and AI infrastructure and in the whole AI forecast running out to 2027 and 2028. Does that hit the overall economy and EPS growth forecasts hard enough that relative safety becomes tough to find? Expect volatility over the next couple of months, and understand that even a 17 VIX does not reflect it.

Taking the pedal off the capex spend is the million-dollar question in this market. One counterview: a capex slowdown could spark a rotation back into the hyperscalers, which have been underperforming.

Comments